I bet you heard about the plan to demolish the Ena De Silva house to make way for a Car park for the
There are talks of trying to re-erect this house in
Yesterday (26th), the house was opened to the public for the last time before the contractors moved in. It is quite disturbing when such things happen and we can see it happening with other rare gems in the future. So what can we do?
I believe it will be useful to decide what to do with a building when it’s no longer 'fit-for-purpose'. It might be useful to consider this at the inception and imbibe ideas of 'after-life' into the design itself. We can see this happening in other parts of the world where they talk about a 'life-span' of a building, then design and construct in such a way something useful can arise at the demise of the building.
It might also be interesting to see how the architect, in this instance the late great Bawa would've reacted to see one of his first masterpieces (I have no doubt that this is one of the Best pieces of Modern houses in the world) perish in the face of rapid urbanisation to make way for a car park for a private hospital next door?
If these acts are allowed to happen without any resistance, others too will follow.
What rights can the public exercise to preserve something of great value to its history, culture and heritage when the legal ownership is held by a private entity?
3 comments:
frikin hilarious cover man....! hahaha!...
i cannot believe that Channa and Murad and the rest of the Bawa trust let this happen! it boggles even the great Zoltan mind
May be there needs to be scheme similar to the Listed Buildings in the England needs to be put in place (I am only refering it as this is the only other country I am familiar with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Listed_building). I am not sure if such thing already exists in Sri Lanka. If not it should really be lobbied for by architects and cultural/heritage conservationists. It imposes restrictions on what can be done to a building regardless of whether it is in private ownership. (Also, I am not sure how this would work out with Sri Lankan concepts of land law. In England of course the Queen(and her relatives) and the Church own most of the freehold land so it might have made things easier!)
So it's really up to industry professionals like yourself to do something about it.
Post a Comment